Konstantin “Stan”
PonomarevTRANSFORMATION & PROGRAM LEADERSHIP
Menu

Program delivery

CASE 01 / ENTERPRISE TRANSFORMATION 2 MIN READ

Technology delivered.
Business change embedded.

NEDRA brought exploration, field development, drilling, production and reliability into one connected digital value chain. My responsibility was to make the technology and the operating model work together in the field.

Jump to the results ↓
35production sites
CONTEXT
Gazprom Neft · NEDRA
MY ROLE
Senior Technical Program Manager
PERIOD
Gazprom Neft tenure · 2017–2025
8centers of excellence
15specialized IT tools
25+cross-functional teams

AT A GLANCE

Program delivery

The mandate

Connect eight centers into one operating model.

My contribution

Govern integration, dependencies and operational acceptance.

The result

A shared delivery model across 35 production sites.

01 / THE CHALLENGE

The problem to solve.

Eight centers and multiple vendors working in parallel can produce eight locally successful tools — and a disconnected operation. Handoffs, shared data and adoption had to be governed at program level.

THE DELIVERY LOGIC ILLUSTRATIVE MODEL

Explore→Develop→Drill
SHARED DATA & GOVERNANCE
Produce→Optimize→Sustain
8 centersONE CONNECTED VALUE CHAIN

02 / KEY DECISIONS

Where I focused.

The central trade-off

Each center could optimize its own technology, but the program needed one operational system. The completion standard joined process change and live IT so local delivery did not leave the end-to-end handoff unfinished.

  1. 01

    Define completion around operational readiness.

    A center could close only when both its operating-model changes and its technology were live. IT deployment alone did not meet the acceptance standard.

  2. 02

    Make shared data a delivery dependency.

    Coordinated the common data foundation and Azure Data Factory integration across 35 production sites, so downstream tools could connect to one system.

  3. 03

    Create one rhythm across teams and vendors.

    Ran SAFe Release Train governance with PI Planning, ART Sync, risk reviews and Inspect & Adapt. Shared standards made cross-team dependencies and vendor commitments visible.

03 / THE OUTCOME

What changed.

  • An integrated delivery model covering 8 centers and 15 specialized tools across 35 production sites.
  • Measurable annual production uplift reported by the program.
  • The NEDRA platform became the basis of an external transformation proposal, with a phased roadmap and pre-contract validation.

04 / MY ACCOUNTABILITY

A clear line of ownership.

These are program outcomes delivered by cross-functional teams and partners. My accountability was program governance, sequencing, integration and the completion standard. The external transformation work described here was proposal and validation work, not a claim of completed deployment.

WORKING PRINCIPLE

The handoffs between teams deserve as much attention as the work inside each team.

Facing a similar mandate?

Let’s discuss the decisions, lessons and experience behind this work.

Discuss this experience

LET’S CONNECT

The next mandate.
Let’s discuss it.

An opportunity, a shared challenge or an exchange of ideas — start a conversation.

Let’s connect

AREAS OF PRACTICE

Transformation management.
Portfolio & program leadership.
AI-enabled business change.

Tampa, Florida
U.S. work authorization
No sponsorship required

Executive profile PDF · 1 pageView LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)